The article talks about a
The article talks about a ‘World Cup’. Not a T20 world cup. There’s only one World Cup and that has no substitute. Only the 1996 team led by Arjuna brought that ultimate glory for the country.

Agree with Arjuna.
The truth
Agree with Arjuna.
The truth underlying here is that Sri Lanka ran Buttler out because there was no other way of getting him out. He played magnificently in the last game and the team was clueless and had no answer. Mathews identified the mankading as the best opportunity to get rid of the menace of Buttler, and upheld the appeal. If a player like Anderson was mankaded, Mathews would have rejected the appeal and the same Sri Lankan fans who are justifying the mankading, will then surely say Mathews did this in the Spirit of the game and boast about it. That is the typical behaviour of blind Sri Lanka cricket fans of modern days. I reiterate this; getting out a batsman with the help of unorthodoxy of a bowler is not a real or long lasting talent.

Agree with Arjuna.
The truth
Agree with Arjuna.
The truth underlying here is that Sri Lanka ran Buttler out because there was no other way of getting him out. He played magnificently in the last game and the team was clueless and had no answer. Mathews identified the mankading as the best opportunity to get rid of the menace of Buttler, and upheld the appeal. If a player like Anderson was mankaded, Mathews would have rejected the appeal and the same Sri Lankan fans who are justifying the mankading, will then surely say Mathews did this in the Spirit of the game and boast about it. That is the typical behaviour of blind Sri Lanka cricket fans of modern days. I reiterate this; getting out a batsman with the help of unorthodoxy of a bowler is not a real or long lasting talent.

He hasn’t said anything about
He hasn’t said anything about any player, nor has he pointed a finger at a particular player.
“Thoppiya hariyana kenekta daganna puluvan”

Very short-sighted decision.
Very short-sighted decision.