Could there be more to Mathews captaincy sacking than fitness alone?

The recent Sri Lanka Cricket press conference to announce the team to play England and the sacking of Angelo Mathews as captain, left the audience with more questions than answers. The main reason for sacking Mathews according to Hathurusinghe and Labrooy was his deteriorating fitness levels. It was highlighted that Mathews struggles to keep up with the physical demands of high intensity formats like ODI’s, due to his poor fitness. They highlighted that Mathews holds the world record for the most involvement in run-outs and that most of those resulted in his partner being out. While these explanations made cricket sense, what did not make logical sense is the fact that these same fitness issues existed when Mathews was talked into captaining the team by Hathurusinghe and Labrooy.  

Hathurusinghe took over the Sri Lankan head coaching job in January 2018, at a time Sri Lanka had been struggling to find a permanent ODI captain. Angelo Mathews stepped down as captain after the shocking ODI defeat to Zimbabwe at home in July 2017. Upul Tharanga replaced Mathews as captain and did win an ODI Tri-Series in Zimbabwe that involved the West Indies as well. However, three 5-0 defeats against South Africa, India and Pakistan and probably the refusal to travel to Pakistan, cost Tharanga his captaincy. With Chandimal having had a forgettable ODI series against Pakistan, selectors turned to Thisara Perera as captain for the tour of India in November 2017. Thisara Perera's appointment was on a temporary basis until Hathurusinghe took over the job and contributed to selecting a permanent captain.
 
Hathurusinghe had very little options from which to pick the ODI captain. Tharanga had been deemed uninspiring. Chandimal was struggling with the bat in the format. Thishara had not warranted a permanent place in the team. It is a well-known fact that Hathurusinghe always had a high regard for Matthews’s ability as a cricketer. Hathurusinghe was his coach when a young Mathews made his mark on an A tour to South Africa in 2008. It was perhaps this relationship, confidence, belief in Mathews’s ability and experience that prompted Hathurusinghe to put his faith in Mathews as his World Cup captain. The fact that a fit Mathews would always warrant a place in the side was probably the main factor behind the decision.
 
While the decision to appoint Mathews might have seemed logical to Hathurusinghe and Labrooy, there were some dark clouds hanging over this decision. The most obvious was his never-ending fitness struggles. Perhaps Hathurusinghe and Labrooy saw it as a risk that comes with greater rewards. In addition to the fitness related risks, a Mathews lead-team had been accused of engaging in ‘suspicious activity’ during the 2017 home ODI loss to Zimbabwe, which prompted the ICC to conduct an investigation. One of the events that raised many eyebrows was the uncharacteristically slow batting of Angelo Mathews in SL’s loss in the 4th ODI of the series. At the time of re-appointing Mathews, SLC CEO claimed that the ICC had cleared SLC of any wrong doing. However, it was later reported that the investigation was still on-going.
 
Mathew’s return to captaincy has looked like a painful-crawl, than a positive stride towards World Cup preparations. He was injured after just one match in Bangladesh in January 2018. He came back to captain the team against South Africa, where Sri Lanka won the last two matches after heavy defeats in the first three. Although he scored two half-centuries, Mathews looked like a captain desperately trying not to break-down with an injury than to inspire his team to a series win.

Mathews headed to the Asia Cup with more than a point or two to prove. He needed to prove his fitness and provide the leadership and inspiration that his young team needed if they were to get past the first round. Instead, Mathews ended the tournament with no wins and looking like a captain who had also lost the trust and support of his team. The manner in which he ran out two of his partners in consecutive matches refueled the conversations about his involvement in suspicious activity. His inability to commit 100% to the team’s cause and even worse, the risk he brings to his batting partners, must certainly have diminished his reputation and respect in the dressing room. At a time when he was expected to be the inspirational leader, set an example for playing with the highest intensity, commitment and honor, Mathews had simply fallen flat.
 
Hathurusinghe’s and Labrooy’s suggestion that Mathews was removed from captaincy on fitness alone does not seem to add up. Mathews has played seven ODI’s in a row and walked off the field without help in each of those. He looks as fit, or to be more accurate, unfit, as he had been on the day he was reappointed captain. Perhaps there is more to this story. Perhaps Mathews has indeed lost his respect in the dressing room. Perhaps some of his actions raise enough suspicion to continue to attract unwanted attention to the team. Perhaps if all of this is indeed true, then why wouldn't the Cricket Board officials make a public announcement that certain incidents are under investigation and the captain has been asked to step down until the conclusion of it. Perhaps the good men in position of power (directly or indirectly) at SLC aren’t hypocrites, which is also why they did not prevent the re-appointment of Mathews while there is still a pending ICC investigation. Whatever it might be, one thing is for sure, Hathurusinghe and Labrooy have finally realized that the gamble they took has more risks than reward!
 

Rate this post

500 points
Upvote Downvote

5 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. Don’t think Matthews has done

    Don’t think Matthews has done anything illegal as you allude to.Think he is a stand up guy. However he is quite obviously is not leadership material for the current group of players we have .

    I think the big problem was matthews wasn’t guiding the team in the right direction in terms of fitness ,discipline and professionalism.

    Hathurusinghe miscalculated the team dynamics when appointing matthews and created this whole mess.

    I think to get the best out of matthews he has to bat at 3,and we need to ask him to play attacking cricket and go over the infield .Which will allow him to get quick singles easily.

  2. Either there is corruption or
    Either there is corruption or there is not. If players act suspiciously they need to be held accountable as if they committed the crime that they have committed. The standard should be that players need to be ethical both in appearance and in fact. CPA’s and other professionals are held to this standard and so should our top players.

  3. It’s funny how Bangladesh is
    It’s funny how Bangladesh is doing so well after Hathurusingha quit:)- chairman of selectors cannot be the coaches puppet— If we lost to Bangladesh again and to Afghanistan and it’s all because of Mathews you have to be off your rocking mind! Mathews is still SL best batsman and as Sangakkara said we need him badly for the World Cup! Dint Hathurusingha also have a lot of conflict s with Bangladeshes senior players. The calm non political Steve Rhodes is providing better results and serenity to Bangladesh Cricket. There was no game plan by the coaching staff the way the team played and not Mathews run outs got srilanka s exit from the Asia Cup. It will also be refreshing if ex chairman of selectors Aravinda is brought back and trying to get Sanga and Mahela to get more involved in Sri Lanka Cricket!!

  4. Mumtaz Yusuf – I am not
    Mumtaz Yusuf – I am not suggesting that SL results had anything to do with Mathews. Only that his removal seems not just fitness related. I agree that Mathews or not, we played poorly in the Asia Cup. Now I wouldn’t know if that was because Mathews refused to follow orders and execute management’s plans or not. Either way, no excuse for losing, agreed 100%.

    On Bangladesh winning after Hathurusinghe left. Perhaps you need to do some research 🙂 They won ALL of their bi-lateral ODI’s at home except for against England under Hathurusinghe. They reached WC semi’s? or second round as well in 2015, correct? I don’t think there is any argument of the influence he had on Bangladesh. That said, this coach now needs to prove his worth in SL and can no longer live on the Bangladesh reputation alone, agreed!

Leave a Reply